Science now implicates the literal account of genesis 1 to be true  

 

 

Abstract...

 

I would like to introduce to you if I may, a reason of thought revealing two new implications you may discover interesting regarding a 'dividing event theory' as to the origin of our moon and unknown significance to an account of such a divide that predates the prevailing theory of modern science...


Let's first establish a reference point. From a 'source' whose date and authorship is unknown today... Something undeniably understood we can all stem from, with regard to this evidential stalemate of resolve as to the planet and our subsequent origins... 


We have its truth among us - It has simply been camouflaged in the confusion of theory by the millions… What can definitively stand out or set itself apart as a foundation to what we are seeking in discussion and debate, that is apparently missing or unknown to man? 


Science submits that approx. 2.5 Billion years ago the planet was entirely submerged under water… (Earth and Planetary Science Letters, DOI:10.1016/j.epsl.2008.08.029) 


With all due respect, this ancient reference point states that the 'beginning condition’ of the planet was entirely submerged under water with no dry land appearing - Millenniums 'before' our modern technology could affirm such a testimony to be true... Consider that for a moment… 


How could this be possibly known to anyone born on dry land after the fact, without the ancient testament itself? Regardless of who eventually recorded it for its future significance today?    


Any testable consideration of resolve, must start from this reference point because - 


Science goes on to submit - They do not know HOW the beginning condition of the planet CHANGED from void of life, entirely submerged UNDER water, to life sustaining inhabitable DRY land? - It is this question of how and its answer that is missing and unknown to man’s resolve…


This event of change would be the ‘lone determining factor’ of creation relevant to complex life form on the planet… Meaning; had this one-time altering event NOT occurred – this rock and its beginning condition is still under water… Consider that for a moment… 


What could this intervening unknown determining event of creation or alteration to the planet be that no one without the appearing of dry land would know, being born after the fact?


This same established source of reference tells us verbatim how this determining factor of change to the planet was made and identifies it by name… Here’s a clue; what settles this in heaven - has everything to do with the lesser light aka the moon… 


Introduction 

 

The Science community, accepts a mars size mass impacted this planet causing the coalescing of the subsequent debris to form our now orbiting moon, as well the scientists go on to deduce, had the impact missed the planet or had not occurred, complex life forms specifically us would not exist without its subsequent moon... 


However – this now introduces ‘two new’ implications as to the planet and its inhabitants ‘contrary’ to our previous understanding as to the origin of our existence – The Big Bangs universe, to our current form water planet, to the eventual evolving of man to present day - since Lemaitre and Darwin…                                                            

The first – In spite of the 14 billion years of the big bangs universe, ‘something else’ had to take place ‘inducing’ complex life form on this planet. Until or unless this impacting event occurred there would be no life, regardless of preexisting universe.


With all material matter, protons, neutrons, hydrogen gases etc. available, light years of existence was void producing no complex life, and had that random mars size rock missed this random rock, who knows how many more billions of years the universe would still be dead or irrelevant to natural life…


The second new implication - the impact caused a ‘divide’ to this single mass of molten rock, ‘resulting’ in two necessary orbiting masses, ‘creating’ a new life sustaining environment, unique to the universe itself… I have not asserted anything; this is peer reviewed science…


However, I submit; this life sustaining ‘dividing event’ was testified to and identified by name thousands of years ago by the ‘literal account of Genesis 1’ – before it was ‘falsely interpreted’ an account as to the ‘origin of the universe’ that in fact, predates the literal life sustaining dividing event of this planet by some 10 billion years or so…


                                                       Dialectic; n. - (The Free dictionary.Com)
  

                              1. The art or practice of arriving at the truth by the exchange of logical 
                                  arguments. 

                              2. The process especially associated with Hegel of arriving at the truth by
                                  stating a thesis, developing a contradictory antithesis, and combining and
                                  resolving them into a coherent synthesis.

                                                         Dialectics - (used with a sing. verb)   

                             A method of argument or exposition that systematically weighs contradictory 
                             facts or ideas, with a view to the resolution of their real or apparent 
                             contradictions.

                             Furthermore - It is ‘The contradiction' between two conflicting 'unresolved' 
                             forces, viewed as the determining 'factor' in their continuing interaction…


Thesis


Science holds to evolution for lack of a more definitive alternative… It’s understandable, by default to deduce an origin of US such as evolution for lack of a more definitive alternative we could all clearly understand without contradicting science or reason, as ST. Augustine put it regarding a literal interpretation of a proclaimed testament… 


Dilemma - billions endure the belief of a ‘questioned testament’ as to the origin of our existence. However, we must know in our heart that the source of this heard word is real or a reality… Otherwise, the validity of its truth is rendered void or vain...


We have nothing empirical that the ‘worlds’ view of understanding can clearly see as of yet with regard to a more definitive alternative as to our origin. An evidential stalemate, from the layman to the scholar…


The testified literal account of this ‘dividing event’ identified by name 9 times in the account alone was declared millenniums before the development and technology of modern science could prove or implicate such a dividing event of this planet to be literally true and therefore, verifying the words of the ‘only source’ who could have known of such a creation to be factually true and none else…

 

Otherwise the idea or knowledge, to anyone born of a woman on ‘this planet thereafter’, would not have been possible for them to imaging or conceive such a divide or significance to anything above the standpoint of view from earth, ‘without’ the testament itself - with us from its foundation…


Our problem is evidently this – The genesis account proclaiming a ‘literal’ dividing event, identified by name 9 times in the account of the event alone, is unknown to ‘bear record’ of these introduced scientific implications of a dividing event theory, due to the fact that the worlds view of understanding and/or belief, is ‘only aware’ of a given ‘invalid interpretation’ of a ‘creation account’ as to the origin of the universe – So that by default, renders the belief held or the account itself false, leaving no empirical alternative to mans theory evolution… 


This proposed dialectical reasoning, will definitively reveal the mystery of a firmament and discover it to be the lone 'resolving event' to the centuries of controversy surrounding the origin of the universe and its theological implications to that of the ancient genesis account of the event - restoring its validity... 


This is not a dispute in creation or evolution, rather the necessary contradiction between two conflicting forces, viewed as the determining factor in their continuing interaction, to which the foundations of both sides are already to date conversely well known… 


2  Unresolved Conflicting Forces   


There are two core conflicting forces perpetuating this stalemate. 1) The creation or evolution of the universe...

2) The mystery of the identity of a firmament…


The controversy resulting in a stalemate with no definitive resolve in sight clearly indicates flawed models unable to correspond or validate the literal account itself. This has consequently resulted in two publicly displayed outcomes.


One, it has led science against the literal account to be false and two, those that support or defend the account are rendered helpless with such a model to show without contradiction its validity - Either the model is flawed or the account itself is false…  

 

                                   First conflicting force - The creation or evolution of the universe.

 

This argument is not over the validity of the genesis account that science now indicate to be literally true but indeed over one worldwide accepted ‘interpretation’ of the genesis account, that science has concluded to be false.


An interpretation of the account to be the creation of the ‘universe’ and that it evolved all within six days. It is this interpretation, widely accepted by Christianity that has been publicly argued, debated, scrutinized and disagreed to even within Christianity itself for hundreds of years now, from Origen in the 3rd century to present day…

  

Indicating a false interpretation or rendering of the account of creation itself… This is affirmed by its inability to agree with science or reason.  


The lack of ability or power for this interpretation to correspond to any physical scientific evidence to declare or prove its validity has been detrimental to our unity. Forcing us to conform to a number of our own experimental physical models and scientific theory…


There is no known literal interpretation of the creation account of genesis 1 accepted by science to be scientifically sound or valid. - The most recent accepted scientific theory however; has publicly conceived two new implications regarding the planet and our existence…

 

The testament of this dividing event, would be the only known literal record of the account that does not contradict science or reason - The ancient genesis 1 account of a Firmament…      

 

                           

Second conflicting force - The mystery of the identity of a firmament.


For thousands of years scholars and philosophers alike have pondered with what has been considered by many to be the greatest mystery of all time. Yet again, the stalemate of the most determining factor to the faith of man has no less than devoured his unity with scattered doubt and uncertainty… 

 

Our blind spot is the opening vision of our planet 'not known by name as of yet', with water all over it... Now as we see the planet covered in water suspended in space, if this is the only model we have, as God divides the waters from the waters as it were, we are left with only limited inconclusive scenarios of what that could look like. (References - Second resolve)

 

See the planet covered in water, as God divides half of the waters or so above the planet, and the remaining waters gather together to one place, where ever that might be, then at some point all the water above floods back to the planet, would that not recover the planet back to its original void state under water?

 

Or the divided waters above the firmament remain above the waters under the firmament. Then our current alleged mystery is; where are the waters above? Being understood by the things that are made as it were should be clearly seen but are clearly not. We have no identified location for the displacement of the waters, on the earth or above it in this scenario, indicating a false model incapable of verifying the account itself… This is affirmed by the mystery of its identity… 

 

Our blind spot however - is revealed in this question; when we see the planet in space covered in water, other than the water itself, what does the planet have in common with any other planet we know of regarding its form?

 

Your only answer should be; it’s round... It’s round or spherical with water all over it...
What form would you say then, any planet we know of is in? Again its form is round...

 

Well, according to the documented testament of the account - this planet not known by name as of yet, was WITHOUT its form, covered entirely with water... I wonder what that model might look like, a PLANET, without its current form, suspended in space, covered in water. It would be the 'true verifying model' to test against the account...

 

The first issue of resolve is the creation or evolution of the universe. The second issue of resolve is the mystery of the identity of a Firmament. The third issue of resolve is the evolution of man as we know him and the fourth issue of resolve is the creation of man as we know him. 


See all references and bibliography at the end of fourth resolve - Let’s get to it…