The fourth resolve addresses the dispute of the creation of man as we know him…


Now, since man does posses the ability and power of the spoken word, with no apparent knowledge of the spoken words origin

Only one question remains…

Question: How is speech then possible, if the word could not have evolved? What other possible explanation could there be?

Answer: The acquisition of the ability of speech comes by hearing it…

Therefore: The origin of mankind, the origin of male and female, the origin of our kind had to posses the ability and power of the spoken word…

That’s phenomenally proven. Otherwise mankind as we know us would not possess the ability to do so, without the acquisition of ever hearing a spoken word or language before

There is no other found scientific explanation to the origin of language… And we are the only vessel or host or kind on this planet, called earth, that is empowered with its’ ability…

Other than the scientific reasoning of speech, what evidence do we have that proclaims, verifies or corroborates this fact?    
           
Is there a documented record that proclaims the origin of our kind possessed the power and ability to speak? Yes

This brings us full circle to the source of the entire dispute of evolution or creation, the creation account of genesis chapter 1…

Now, it is my hope that the new light that is now seen in the second resolve regarding “the firmament” of the genesis account, by taken us out of the cosmos and theories of the universe’s origin, and putting us more in the actual creation of “the heaven” and “the earth” verbatim of the creation of the world, being understood by the things that are made, without contradicting science or reason, would restore the validity and the authority of the testament itself… An explicit truth without interpretation…

This “restored” authoritative account if you will, states the origin of US, spoke…  It goes on to say as you know that the origin of our kind not only spoke but also reasoned before He made the firmament in the midst of the waters which allowed everything else to be, and it was good…

He named light day and darkness night, before He made it possible with the firmament causing the rotation of the planet resulting in a raising and lowering of the sun, to have a day and night, meaning His ACT was purposeful, strategic, calculating and knowledgeable…

Once all was created and made to His liking and after its’ kind, land, seas, grass, trees, animals and so forth, He was ready to inhabit the planet He called Earth…

The text says for the first time, after all He had made and created, in verse 26; The origin of US (first usage) multiplied in His own Image after His own likeness. Male and female, He said unto them and blessed them… He possessed the power to speak, and being born fully capable He translated that very ability to His sons and daughters, so that they by hearing the spoken word, would possess a power that would enable them to have dominion and subdue the planet called earth, and it was so…

The Word: The lone factoring entity to the advancement and creative development of our conscious nature and the physical reality of its manifested civilization of our entire existence as we know it, from Genesis to Revelation and every single known and unknown thing in between…

Without it, scientifically speaking, was not anything made that was made…

The origin of man from the creation of the world, whom possesses the power and ability of the spoken

word, could not have originated here on this planet any other scientifically proven way. That can be clearly understood… According to the Testament…

The invisible things of Him from the creation of the world are clearly seen being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead, So that man would be without excuse…



  
References:

INTRO - FIRST - SECOND 

 

 

[1]. Dr. Stephen Hawking – The Creation Question: Curiosity Conversation – 8/7/12)

 

[2]. Numbers 1992, p. 18, noting that this applies to published or public skeptics. Many or most

Christians may have held on to a literal six days of creation, but these views were rarely expressed in

books and journals. Exceptions are also noted, such as literal interpretations published by , Eleazar

Lord (1788–1871), David Nevins Lord (1792–1880), and E. G. White (1829-1915). However, the

observation that evolutionary critics had a relaxed interpretation of Genesis is supported by

specifically enumerating: Louis Agassiz (1807–1873); Arnold Henry Guyot (1807–1884); John William

Dawson (1820–1899); Enoch Fitch Burr (1818–1907); George D. Armstrong (1813–1899);

Charles Hodge, theologian (1797–1878); James Dwight Dana (1813–1895); Edward Hitchcock,

clergyman and Amherst College geologist, (1793–1864); Reverend Herbert W. Morris (1818–1897); H.

L. Hastings (1833?–1899); Luther T. Townsend (1838–1922; Alexander 

Patterson, Presbyterian evangelist.

 

[3]. Isaak, Mark (2006). "An Index to Creationist Claims". Talkorigins Archive.

http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/index.html.

Creation – Evolution Controversy (Wikipedia – free encyclopedia)

 

[4]. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Augustine_of_Hippo#Natural_knowledge_and_biblical_interpretation.

(accessed March 2012).

 

[5]. Larson 2004, p. 258 "Virtually no secular scientists accepted the doctrines of creation science; but

that did not deter creation scientists from advancing scientific arguments for their position." See also

Martz & McDaniel 1987, p. 23, "By one count there are some 700 scientists (out of a total of 480,000

U.S. earth and life scientists) who give credence to creation-science, the general theory that complex

life forms did not evolve but appeared 'abruptly'."

 

[6].^ Judge John E. Jones III: "A final indicator of how ID has failed to demonstrate

scientific warrant is the complete absence of peer-reviewed publications supporting the

theory...The evidence presented in this case demonstrates that ID is not supported by

any peer-reviewed research, data or publications." (Ruling, Kitzmiller v. Dover Area

School District 4: whether ID is science).

 

[7].a b Canup, R.; Asphaug, E. (2001). "Origin of the Moon in a giant impact near the end of the

Earth's formation". Nature 412 (6848): 708–712. Bibcode 2001Natur.412..708C

doi:10.1038/35089010.PMID11507633.

http://www.es.ucsc.edu/~rcoe/eart206/canup_Moon_Nature_01.pdf. Retrieved 2011-12-10.

 

[8].Authorized King James Version, Nashville, Tennessee, Holman Bible Publishers (1985)

 

[9]. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georges_Lema%C3%AEtre (Accessed 2012)

 

[10]. Dr. Stephen Hawking – The Creation Question: Curiosity Conversation – 8/7/12)

 

[11]. Discovery Channel, The Universe, “The Day the Moon was Gone”,  Season 4, Episode 2 (Original

air date, Aug. 25, 2009)

 

[12]. Genesis Chapter1, verses 6-10, KJV – And God said let there be ‘a’ firmament in the midst of the

waters and let it divide the waters from the waters. And God made ‘the’ firmament and divided the

waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was

so. And God called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning were the second day. And

God said, Let the waters under the heaven be gathered together unto one place and let the day

appear: and it was so. And God called the dry Earth; and the gathering together of the waters called he Seas;

and God saw that good.

 

[13]. Douglas Cox; 1996 - (Report on the Firmament) - http://tcc.customer.sentex.ca/FIRM/RFs.php 

 

[14]. Genesis Chapter1, verses 6-10, KJV – And God said let there be a firmament in the midst of the

waters and let it divide the waters from the waters. And God made the firmament and divided the

waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so. And God called the

firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning were the second day. And God said, Let the waters under the heaven be (gathered

together unto one place) and let the day appear: and it was so. And God called the dry Earth; and the gathering together of the waters called

he Seas; and God saw that good.

 

[15].   2008Natur.454..192S  Abstract -  The Moon is generally thought to have formed and evolved through a single or a series of 

catastrophic heating events, during which most of the highly volatile elements were lost. Hydrogen, being the lightest element, is believed to 

have been completely lost during this period. Here we make use of considerable advances in secondary ion mass spectrometry to obtain 

improved limits on the indigenous volatile (CO2, H2O, F, S and Cl) contents of the most primitive basalts in the Moon-the lunar volcanic 

glasses. Although the pre-eruptive water content of the lunar volcanic glasses cannot be precisely constrained, numerical modeling of diffusive 

degassing of the very-low-Ti glasses provides a best estimate of 745p.p.m. water, with a minimum of 260p.p.m. at the 95 per cent 

confidence level. Our results indicate that, contrary to prevailing ideas, the bulk Moon might not be entirely depleted in highly volatile 

elements, including water. Thus, the presence of water must be considered in models constraining the Moon's formation and its thermal and 

chemical evolution.

 

[16]. Discovery Channel, The Universe, “The Day the Moon was Gone”,  Season 4, Episode 2 (Original

air date, Aug. 25, 2009)

 

[17].http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vienna_Standard_Mean_Ocean_Water Vienna Standard Mean

Ocean Water (VSMOW) is a water standard defining the isotopic composition of freshwater. It was

promulgated by the International Atomic Energy Agency in 1968, and, since 1993, continues to be

evaluated and studied by the IAEA along with the EuropeanInstitute for Reference Materials and

Measurements and the AmericanNational Institute for Standards and Technology. The standard

includes both the established values of stable isotopes found in waters and calibration materials

provided for standardization and inter laboratory comparisons of instruments used to measure these

values in experimental materials. The designation ocean water refers (only to the evaporation of

ocean waters in the hydrologic cycle as the original source of fresh surface and ground waters and

precipitation), but VSMOW is not a standard for seawater. Fresh distilled VSMOW water is also used

for making high accuracy measurement of water's physical properties and for defining laboratory

standards since it is considered to be representative of average ocean water, in effect representing all

water on Earth.

 

[18].http://starchild.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/StarChild/questions/question38.html - High Energy

Astrophysics Science Archive Research Center (HEASARC), Dr. Alan Smale (Director) within the

Astrophysics Science Div. (ASD) at NASA/GSFC proposes that any theory which explains the existence

of moon must naturally explain the following facts; the moon’s low density (3.3g/cc) shows that it

does not have a substantial iron core like the earth does – Moon rocks contain few volatile substances

(e.g. water), which implies extra baking of the lunar surface relative to that of earth – the relative

abundance of oxygen isotopes on earth and on the moon are identical, which suggests that the 

earth and moon formed at the same distance from the Sun…  

 

[19]. Saal, Alberto E. et al. (July 10m2008). “volatile content of lunar volcanic glasses and the

presence of water in the Moon’s interior”. Nature 454 (7201): 192-195. Bibliographic code

2008Natur.454.. 192s 

 

 
 
THIRD - FOURTH

1. Origin of language (Wikipedia.)

2. Smaller jawbone structure & Foxp2 gene (National geographic doc. Human Ape) & (Origin of language report under Homo sapiens p. 5)

3. Henry Morris, Ph.D. (The Mystery of Human Language)

4. Raised in silence experiment; (Origin of language, historical experiments, p. 10. & footnote #35, 36)